Just another WordPress.com site

Month: February, 2015

Punch-Drunk Love

Punch-Drunk Love may be the most divisive film I’ve shown in class. About 1/3 of my students HATED it, 1/3 seemed to love it, and the other 1/3 just seemed baffled by it. And it was often the same elements that led each group to its judgment. Certainly, it has an abrasive style: Jon Brion’s manic score, the over-exposed lighting, and Barry Egan’s visible anxiety all coalesce into a roller-coaster viewing experience. I can understand why some people wouldn’t want to inhabit that world, if only for 90 minutes, but for me, it’s a thrilling experience.

I want to focus specifically on my favorite sequences in the film: Barry’s sister Elizabeth (Mary Lynn Rajskub) brings Lena (Emily Watson) to meet Barry and see if he’d like to get breakfast. This sequence is perfection. It’s crucial to note that Jon Brion’s frantic “Tabla” theme is playing throughout, which amps up the intensity of what’s happening:

pdl 1

It begins with Barry stepping outside while drinking his coffee. Variations of this shot are repeated throughout the film. The outside world is always overexposed and bright. For Barry, terrifying things happen outside of his cool, blue shop, so Anderson makes sure it always appears alien. Sure enough, as he looks down the drive, he sees Elizabeth and Lena approaching. He frantically backs up (a recurring tendency), turns, and starts sprinting towards his office.

pdl 2

Here, we get a play on the horizontal tracking shot Anderson has been using throughout the film. Usually, the camera is set-up on the opposite side of this table, but here we’re looking into the warehouse as Barry trips over an unknown object. This shot serves a few purposes. First, we get a slapsticky fall, as a funny Adam Sandler film should have. Second, we establish Lance’s location. Finally, we establish the forklift that will play a role later. This shot is particularly great for the way Barry pops right back up and continues into his office while telling Lance to keep the floor clear.

pdl 3

I love this shot. This is the position Barry puts himself in to receive his sister and Lena. A recurring theme of the film is that Barry takes his job very seriously (hence dressing up in his suit) and he is desperate that people view him professionally. Obviously, this is how a boss hangs out in his office.

As Lena and Elizabeth enter, we get another variation on the tracking shot. The camera picks them up as they walk in, wraps back behind the table, and tracks back as they walk towards the camera. About halfway down the Funger line, the camera rotates 180 degrees and picks up Barry as he approaches the two women. In one swoop, the camera has become Lena and Elizabeth. We cut and see the three in profile.

pdl 4

pdl 5

pdl 6

During this initial exchange, Elizabeth is bombarding Barry with questions about his piano, the pudding, and breakfast. Her assaultive dialogue mixed with Brion’s score is nerve-scraping. It’s crucial, though, that Lena is quiet a reserved, and when she talks, it’s almost in a whisper.

As they are talking, Barry gets a phone call, and the camera squares up on Barry between the girls’ shoulders. As Barry walks back to answer the phone, the camera slowly tracks in on him. It’s the phone-sex girl from the night before and Barry is understandably confused on how she got his number.

pdl 7 pdl 8b pdl 9 pdl 10

As Barry looks back at the women, Lena suggests that they come back later, as Barry is clearly busy, and the two walk outside so Lena can go pay for her car (that’s in the repair shop next door). As Lena leaves the frame, Elizabeth angrily turns around and storms back into the office. I love the intensity of Mary Lynn Rajskub as she walks. She deserved an Oscar for this 10 seconds.

I love the interaction between Barry and his sister’s in this film. They are an insane family, and it’s clear that as the only boy, Barry suffered. And although they are mean to him, it’s also clear that they love him. They are worried about him. And in the case of Elizabeth, her instincts were right about Lena. They do make an amazing couple. But Anderson does an amazing job of displaying the power-dynamics of their relationship through the basic staging of these scenes. As Elizabeth gets into Barry’s office, where he’s still on the phone with Georgia the phone-sex operator, she gets as close to him as she possibly can. Instictively, Barry tries to get away from her, but there’s just not enough room to escape. pdl 11 pdl 12 pdl 13 pdl 14

It’s actually a really complicated scene to shoot because they are in an incredibly tight space. They are also dealing with the telephone cord which Barry has to navigate around the harmonium perched on his desk. And the whole time, Elizabeth is just trying to make eye-contact with Barry who is avoiding it like death. Finally, she traps him in this corner where she asks him why he needs to see a therapist: “What’s the matter with you? Are you ok?” She’s genuinely scared for him. Naturally, Barry deflects the questions and is only saved by the returning Lena, who suggests they better head out.

pdl 15

Elizabeth gives her a “Yep..no..” and leaves to get something from her car.

pdl 16

Finally, we think we are going to get a one-on-one sequence with Lena and Barry, but just as Elizabeth leaves, Lance walks in to clarify something Barry mentioned earlier about a guy in Toledo.

pdl 17

This simple shot is a perfect example for how PTA is able to get across character information in a purely visual way. First, Barry is sitting down in his chair because that’s what bosses do. Like standing with the harmonium, he’s trying to show Lena that he’s in charge. But by shooting over Lance, who is standing, Anderson robs Barry of that power. The power dynamic is off here. We get a reverse-shot emphasizing this:

pdl 18

Barry can’t clarify about the man in Toledo, because there isn’t a man in Toledo. He made it up to seem important. Crucially, Lena is staring over Lance’s shoulder to see how Barry operates, which only amplifies his insecurity.

This is a crucial tactic in Anderson’s approach to the romantic-comedy. He actively works to delay the expectations we have of the genre. Although he hits all the necessary plot moves, they always happen after they are supposed to. We just want to see these two talk already! And finally, Lance leaves, but we don’t get the sort of payoff we want because Anderson distracts from the two in the sound mixing. Just as Lena begins to apologize for missing the party the night before, the forklift overwhelms the soundtrack and its movement distracts us visually

pdl 19

Just as they finally start to talk, they get interrupted again with a worker telling Barry he has another phonecall.

pdl 20

I love how Lena is starting to get a little overwhelmed here. Throughout the film, she is the picture of calm, but the way she scrunches away from this guy indicates that even she would be affected by this setting. This is a crucial little moment because the key between her and Barry is that she truly understands and appreciates his experience. She sees how the world affects him and admires the way he is able to deal with it, whereas his sisters think he’s weird.

pdl 21

As Barry answers and quickly hangs up the phone, Lena takes the opportunity to actually sit down. Again, given the way Anderson has established the power dynamics with Barry sitting and his workers standing, it’s a key gesture that Lena wants to get on his level. But she does so tentatively, carefully reading his body language to make sure she isn’t overstepping. The whole film has been building this way incrementally. When Lena and Barry first meet, they are actually outside the building. When they meet again, they are about half-way into the building. And then she’s at the door. And now she’s in the chair.

But of course, we aren’t getting a break. That forklift from earlier zips across the background and slams into the wall of pallets to Barry’s right. Lena jumps up to look at the crash, but Barry jumps up to maintain eye-level with Lena. He’s so focused in on her that he is oblivious to the chaos in his shop.

pdl 23 pdl 24

Elizabeth returns, but still, Barry is only focused on Lena, even after another catastrophe involving the forklift in the background.

pdl 25b

Even Lena has given up by this point, and she sort of stumbles out of the office and Elizabeth follows. The world has overwhelmed her, in much the same way as this sequence of the film overwhelms the audience. All Barry can do is watch with regret as she leaves, the harmonium providing his only relief.

pdl 26 pdl 27 pdl 28

But there’s a twist here. Again, so much of this sequence works on repetition: the phone ringing, the tracking shot from the front of the office to the back, the score, Elizabeth’s circular questioning. So we get the same shot that originally sent Lena next door, only now they are leaving for good. But the camera does something unique. It follows Lena all the way to her car where she hesitates before turning around and returning to the warehouse.

pdl 30 pdl 31

We get another variation on the tracking shot here. Instead of following her from the inside, we track along the outer wall, only catching up to her at the other garage door. Here, the camera moves into the warehouse and frames everyone perfectly as Lena finally asks Barry out. It’s a great shot. I love Barry’s just watching this date proposal unfold. Usually, this would mortify Barry (he’s already told his sister he didn’t want her to bring Lena to the party because everyone would be looking at him), but here he’s just happy. He’s so focused in that he doesn’t even register how incredibly awkward this is.pdl 32

Finally, the two move to a workbench so she can write down her number and address. As she’s writing, Barry, unprovoked, finally answers all the questions that his sister had asked in the previous 8 minutes. It’s a great little monologue that Lena doesn’t seem to even notice. It’s crucial that the score has slowly faded away now. Finally, it’s just two people talking. As Lena walks off, the phone rings again. It’s Georgia again promising Barry a “war” and we transition to Provo, site of D&D Mattress Man.

pdl 33 pdl 34

For me, this is just a bravado sequence. The core conflicts and stakes of the film are established in just 8:09 of screen time. The use of repetition and variations help establish both the rhythm and the tone of the film, but also provide a satisfying arc to this particular sequence. It almost works as a short film in and of itself. Punch-Drunk Love builds a set of expectations that are really firmly established in this sequence. In particular, the phone ringing and its implications will pay off in a variety of ways. But also, through the mise en scène, Anderson is able to visually establish character relations and power hierarchies that are going to be played with throughout the second half of the film.

Wes Anderson

For some reason, I had originally planned for my classes to each watch a film by Michael Haneke. Obviously, I am an idiot. During the course of the class, it quickly became apparent that they wouldn’t necessarily produce a productive class conversation. Most of my students are fairly new to looking at movies the way I’m asking them to, and Haneke is clearly a step too far. So, I reworked my schedule and replaced him with two films from Wes Anderson. I thought I’d lighten the mood while also working towards an easy example of an auteur. We watched The Royal Tenenbaums  in my first class and Rushmore in my second.

As prep work, I also watched Bottle Rocket, The Darjeeling Limited, and Fantastic Mr. Fox. I had never seen Fox, and the other two maybe only once. I’ll probably have a “best of” list later once I can catch Moonrise Kingdom again.

I was struck by a few things in this Wes Anderson binge. First, it’s incredible how much of a leap he made from Bottle Rocket to Rushmore. There aren’t a lot of signs in his debut film that he would become one of the most visually distinctive directors in the world (maybe in film history). Largely hand-held, there are only a few smattering hints at the visual proclivities he’d become famous for. Instead, it is the thematic things that are forming: mental illness, perpetual adolescence, grandiose plans, failed potential. All of these things will be dealt with more overtly as his career continues.

Between Bottle Rocket and Rushmore, something clicked. Suddenly, his camera is purposeful and directed, not the handheld, verite style of the earlier film. This is a director’s movie. Although he occasionally uses over-the-shoulder shots in conversations, they are increasingly replaced by dead on, fourth wall breaking portraits. Conversations are done in shot/reverse-shot with the camera taking up the position of each speaker.

And he’s initiated his horizontal tracking shots, perhaps most effectively when Max is attempting to build an aquarium on Rushmore’s baseball diamond. As Max walks parallel, he is forced to stop to take care of minor issues with minor characters, a tendency that Anderson will come back to again and again in his career. These tracking shots are supplemented with his 90 degree angle pans that sweep the screen and replace a more conventional cut. Quickly, these pans won’t just move left or right, but up and down as well.

What’s great about Rushmore is how this style serves the comedy; the pans and tracks and dead-on framing embellish the material and make it feel alive. My favorite example of this is a sequence between Mrs. Cross and Max in the library. The scene begins square on Mrs. Cross as she reads at a desk. When she runs out of water, Max’s hand enters screen left with a pitcher of lemonade. As he leaves, we get a reverse shot of Max at his desk. The editing reveals that they are sitting right across from each other, but it seems to have happened without Mrs. Cross noticing. Thus, the editing and framing cue us in to Max’s creepy, stalkerish obsession. He could have cut to a two-shot parallel to them, but that wouldn’t have been as funny as it is now. When Anderson isn’t on his game, his idiosyncratic camera-work happens in spite of the script, rather than in aid it (something I would say The Life Aquatic suffers from). But in Rushmore, everything just clicks.

The Royal Tenenbaums is a heightened continuation of Rushmore. In Rushmore, what will become Anderson’s hallmarks are localized in Max; in The Royal Tenenbaums, every character is their own, weird little person, complete with costume and affectation. In many ways, this is the film’s weakness. Whereas Rushmore really pushes its worldview through dialogue and interaction, so much of The Royal Tenenbaums is obvious visually. Only Royal seems really to carry the screen the way Max was able to. He’s also the least “curated” of the characters, and we learn about him through action less than affectation.

But I was struck by how much of The Royal Tenenbaums has stuck with me, even though I hadn’t seen it in so long. When Nico’s “Some Days” started playing, I was all in. It doesn’t matter how much he uses that slow-mo, I will love it every time.

I fell out with Wes Anderson after The Royal Tenenbaums. I like The Life Aquatic, but not as passionately, and The Darjeeling Limited just didn’t work for me (I like it much better now than I did then). I never even saw Fantastic Mr. Fox until last week. But I’ve loved his new films, Moonrise Kingdom and The Grand Budapest Hotel. In particular, I think Budapest is a real step forward. It’s the most pristinely photographed of his films (in class, I just randomly went from scene to scene thoughout the film, and every one was a perfectly framed image), but it also has one of the best performances in any Anderson film: Ray Fiennes’s Mr. Gustav. Somehow, inexplicably, he doesn’t feel like a character at all. And its emphasis on plotting is also an interesting development. I hope this is just a signal that Wes Anderson is going to continue pushing himself while maintaining his own style.

%d bloggers like this: